Placeholder canvas

Army Reopens Investigation of Green Beret who Killed a Bomb Maker

09 December 2016 — The Army has reopened an investigation into a former Green
Beret after he admitted during a News interview that he killed a suspected Taliban
bombmaker they had held in Afghanistan.

Maj. Matthew Golsteyn already had faced an initial investigation after acknowledging
during a polygraph test he had killed the unarmed suspect. While that case was later
closed, Golsteyn appeared on the Fox News special “How We Fight” in October and
discussed the incident publicly.

The suspected Taliban member in question was held during the battle of Marja in
February 2010. The suspect, though, was not on a list of targets U.S. forces were
cleared to kill — and after he was detained, Golsteyn said he refused to talk to

Under the rules of engagement, Golsteyn was ordered to release him.
However, Golsteyn, who was deployed to Afghanistan as part of 3rd Special Forces
Group, was concerned that if he did so, the suspect would have in turn targeted
Afghans who were helping U.S. soldiers.

“There’s limits on how long you can hold guys,” he told Fox News’ Bret Baier. “You
realize quickly that you make things worse. It is an inevitable outcome that people who
are cooperating with coalition forces, when identified, will suffer some terrible torture or
be killed.”

Golsteyn told Fox News he killed him.

A senior U.S. defense official confirmed to Fox News on Friday that the Army has
reopened its investigation based on new evidence that includes the Green Beret’s
public statements. The Washington Post first reported on the reopened probe.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., is fighting the Army’s decision to revisit the case. In a
Dec. 7 letter to Army Secretary Eric Fanning and Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley,
Hunter said Golsteyn has been “unfairly targeted.”

“The fact that his case has been reopened, on the grounds it has, is more proof of
a process that, even though intended to pursue the facts, can also be leveraged for
retaliation,” Hunter wrote.

Golsteyn defended his actions during a phone interview with Fox News on Friday.
“I made a lawful engagement of a known enemy combatant on the battlefield,” he said,
while also disputing characterizations that the Taliban suspect was a “detainee” since
he was “never processed.”

“We were told that protecting the civilian population was priority number one, even at
the cost of our own lives. I did that,” he said.

Golestyn reportedly described taking the bombmaker off base, shooting him and
burying his remains in a shallow grave. He said he and two other soldiers dug up the
remains and burned them in a pit used to dispose of trash.

“We hashed all of this out with the Army a year and a half ago. I don’t have anything
that I am ashamed of,” he told Fox on Friday.

“It’s dangerous to take combat out of its context. Combat is a horrible thing. You can
take anything and make it sound uncomfortable,” he added.

Golsteyn, who had been awarded the Silver Star, the military’s third-highest award for
combat valor, was initially accused of murder and conspiracy. Following a lengthy
investigation by a military tribunal, no formal charges were filed.  

Instead, Golsteyn was removed from the Special Forces and had his Silver Star taken

In an email to The Washington Post, Golsteyn said he was “frustrated, but not terribly
surprised” the Army reopened its investigation. He added that the Defense Department
and Army had “viciously pursued” him “without a discernible cause or a stated goal for
over five years.”

No other service members would testify against Golsteyn, even when they were
offered immunity from prosecution.

Hunter says he’ll continue to champion on Golsteyn’s behalf.

“Golsteyn is an American hero – a true warrior, in fact. Why the Army is hell-bent on
destroying a combat hero’s career is truly astonishing,” Hunter wrote, adding that the
Army has “the ability to fix this stupidity.”

Army spokeswoman Lt. Col. Jennifer Johnson reportedly said in a statement that it
would be “inappropriate to comment further regarding an ongoing investigation.”